Is there only one way to reach God?
Published on April 25, 2011 By lulapilgrim In Religion

On another blog, a fellow JoeUser asked the following questions and made the following comments:

 

I am irritated with the closed-mindedness of organizations with causes. If there is only one way (YOUR way) to reach God … why are there so many divergent paths and religions making the same claim? What makes you think it is even conceivable that a paper trail in excess of 2000 years could contain much resemblance to the original fictions?

I am sure you have heard of the test that goes like this: Get a group of 10 people in a circle and whisper a statement to one person. Then they whisper it to the next and so on. There has never been a valid documented case where the original statement bore much resemblance to the 10th person’s statement. This is simply explained with the fact that people are different and they think ‘differently’. Organizations do not like this concept which they classify as ‘self-serving individualism’. 

I must be a fool (as you are want to tell me) because I do not believe that the concepts of lying, deceit and conspiracy, power struggles, suppressing the masses, limiting real knowledge, murder, deception and intrigue are new to this century or any other for that matter. But of course, religious theology was not susceptible to human contamination … of course. I believe these concepts were in existence long before recorded time. Why would this befouling of the truth affecting all of human history, exclude ONLY Christian Doctrine? Only mind dead robots could believe this absurdity.


Comments (Page 6)
21 PagesFirst 4 5 6 7 8  Last
on May 23, 2011

Yes, every single book or documentary ever made is bias to one side or the other, consciously or subconsciously. If a person really wants "The Truth" the will have to sift through mountains of what others call their "Truth" and make up your own mind.

I could start pointing history books that are used in the "Education System" that are full of out-right lies. But history is always written by the victors or those currently in control. Control is the key word, shaping minds is thee most important issue our masters face when keeping the masses in line.

on May 23, 2011

The following is an observation and a question.

BoobzTwo
You have a need to know because it is fundamental to your faith but I do not. I understand and accept empirical evidence on its face value, not because someone tells me or because of some book that forces me.

BT posts #11  I believe things because I can prove them or am willing to accept the proof of others who can provide their proof.

lulapilgrim
Lula posts: “Believing in the One God seems to be the natural condition or intuition”-

BT posts: Believing in Nature satisfies all my conditional needs.

BT posts:

BoobzTwo
Personally, I cannot take much you claim to be true to be, if for no other reason than you refuse to allow empirical contemporary science to enter into the discussion......

Lula posts: Since you don't believe God created nature, but believe in nature,  I have to ask....... how did nature come to be on earth and what is the body of empirical scientific evidence that supports that?

BT posts: #64 

BoobzTwo
To be perfectly honest I do not really care.

Hmmm......can you see that you don't hold yourself up to your own professed standards of believing things because you can prove them?

 

on May 23, 2011

BoobzTwo

You see a homosexual and you place them into that circle then pretend they are attacking the church, even though you know that homosexuality persist in the ranks of the church leaders.

BoobzTwo
Homosexuality exists in all sections of society, in most church … and all the way to the Vatican, yet you condemn them

You've brought up the grave scandal of homosexuality in the church twice and so it bears a response.

The Church has consistently condemned all forms of sexual immorality which includes homosexuality ever since the days of Christ and His Apostles when the Church was first established.  

Christ warned that scandals would come. The human side of the Mystical Body of Christ (the Church) is made up of sinners and Catholics themselves condemn the bad conduct of anyone of her individual members, her priests and religious included. Faithful Catholics are outraged by the immoral behavior of those priests who sin against God's Sixth Commandment and dissent from the constant teachings of the Church.

The sin is being exposed, Our Lord's way of purifying His Church.

At the same time, there are thousands of holy priests who have retained the Faith. 

 

BT posts:

That may be so, but there is no excuse for the church sheltering and protecting the perverts, providing them with financing (from your coffers) and relocating them to 'safer' places to what ... recover? ...... “Our Lord's way of purifying His Church”, but it seems that the church is just waiting for this to happen … this is just one example of the hypocrisy of all religions.

Praise Almighty God the clerical sex abuse scandal and the coverup has been exposed. Catholics acknowledge the reality of the horrible acts of the abusers and we are absolutely outraged at those who covered it up. We are most compassionate for the victims and work is being done to assure this never happens again. 

I have every reason for hope knowing the vast majority of priests and bishops are honest, faithful servants of Christ and His service as ministers to His people.

 

on May 23, 2011

BoobzTwo
But there is nothing that I have found that substanciates biblical ... anything?

Imagine that!  

History itself, archaeology, ancient artifacts, Dead Sea Scrolls, and Herod's palace aren't good enough proof!  Doesn't pass the science test you say! 

Could it be because you've hardened your heart to truly seeking truth and have purposefully put blinders up...and like a fitful child.....don't want to see...and don't want to hear and don't want to really know of Almighty God and His Church and  revealed one, holy, catholic and apostolic  religion?

Just something to think about.

on May 23, 2011

BoobzTwo
Lula, first I do not know that evolution is true, it is just a working and physically plausible theory.

Darwinian Evolution is a pseudo scientific theory that has been masqueraded as fact in all government schools and one that atheistic materialists have placed all their marbles.

on May 23, 2011

BoobzTwo
A couple thousand years ago the world was flat, everyone knew that. Say, wasn’t that back around the times when your bible was being composed? I do not think the concept of a universe or galaxy or even a solar system was much in their minds … so I do not think your arguments for universal scope came from the writers of the bible???

My goodness, here you are trying to slam religion and the Bible using the flat earth myth!

 Let's take what you said line by line.

BoobzTwo
A couple thousand years ago the world was flat, everyone knew that.

Actually more than a couple thousand years ago, people knew the earth was a globe  thanks to the writings of Isaias, one of God's prophets.  He lived in the time of Hezekiah, King of Judah in 716-687 BC. Isaias was killed (martyred for the faith) by being sawed in half by his son-in-law, King Manasses. God knew the earth was a globe; after all, He created it that way. God inspired Isaias to write His prophecy.

Check out Isaias 40:21-22.

It states, "Do you not know? Hath it not been heard? Hath it not been told you from the beginning? Hath you not understood the foundations of the Earth? It is he that sits upon the globe of the earth....."

So there you have it...sometime between 716 and 687 BC when Isaias penned God's prophecy, they knew the earth was a globe.

And this knowledge that the earth was a globe wasn't lost to the subsequent generations. The medieval scholars and scientists (Jean Buridan and Nicholas Oresme for example) never doubted the earth is a globe or sphere and by the 15th century the fact the earth was a globe was fully grasped. 

Christopher Columbus was a devout Catholic and he knew the earth was not flat becasue he knew the Scriptures.

 

BoobzTwo
Egad … everyone knew the stars and the moon rotated around the Earth in the mid-16th century. You see, science has a way of sneaking up on people and more or less forcing them to at least explain themselves and present their evidence.

Who were many of the early scientists?...Catholics….and some were priests.

Turns out "your" science in this case had to catch up with the Bible, didn't it?

on May 23, 2011

lulapilgrim
Who were many of the early scientists?...Catholics….and some were priests.

Turns out "your" science in this case had to catch up with the Bible, didn't it?

LOL, how many books did your "church" ban. How many early scientists and priests did your "church" declare enemy's of the the church and brutally kill? Quote me some of these if you are up with your church history.

 

 21 Do you not know? 
   Have you not heard? 
Has it not been told you from the beginning? 
   Have you not understood since the earth was founded? 
22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth
   and its people are like grasshoppers. 
He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, 
   and spreads them out like a tent to live in.

 I have 3 different bibles and they all read the same way. I think you need to look up the difference between circle and globe.

on May 23, 2011

lulapilgrim
lulapilgrim
Lula ... The gist of all those quotes is this. I think we both believe in the spectacular wonders of nature. You just think something snapped their proverbial fingers and I believe it is nothing more than the natural progression of matter as it endlessly adapts in the constant struggle to survive. As I said … somewhere (?) … we do not have the science to help you in any of your endeavors because it always gets back to faith first and then irrationality over and over again. By the way, I believe the sciences have made a valiant effort to try and help you guys out … they just couldn’t.

on May 23, 2011

I am willing to bet that in the near future your quote will be edited to "Globe" so that you can use it properly in arguments like you just failed at. 

on May 23, 2011

myfist0
I am willing to bet that in the near future your quote will be edited to "Globe" so that you can use it properly in arguments like you just failed at.
Absolutely amazing ... but I am quite used to failing herein, hehehe. Do you think "flat globe" would do it?

on May 23, 2011

lulapilgrim
History itself, archaeology, ancient artifacts, Dead Sea Scrolls, and Herod's palace aren't good enough proof! Doesn't pass the science test you say!
A lot of words Lula, but I have looked and I did not find support at all for the existence of Your God, is all. Just because something is old has nothing to do with this, so if you actually have something that was revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls, Herod's palace, ancient artafacts, archaeology or history ... let me know because then we would have something to discuss.

lulapilgrim
Could it be because you've hardened your heart to truly seeking truth and have purposefully put blinders up...and like a fitful child.....don't want to see...and don't want to hear and don't want to really know of Almighty God and His Church and revealed one, holy, catholic and apostolic religion?
Could be I guess, humm... hardened heart (?) … truly seeking the truth(?) … purposeful blinders (?)… a fitful child (?) … doesn’t want to ‘HEAR’, humm. I agree, one of us is inflicted in this manor …

Lula, I really do not like this, it is not how I like to correspond so at least try and stop taking what I say as a personal attack, I just do not believe ... what else am I supposed to do or say?

on May 23, 2011

lulapilgrim
Darwinian Evolution is a pseudo scientific theory that has been masqueraded as fact in all government schools and one that atheistic materialists have placed all their marbles.
You sound like you believe they are supposed to teach the truth in school ... really, you believe that? Have you talked to many teenagers lately and asked them what they are learning in school … have you looked at their texts yourself? You are only opposed to Darwinian Theory because you do not believe it … and yet you would accept a course in irrationality as its replacement, tut, tut, tut… just about everything in school is a charade of one kind or another. But yes, I would rather have them teach pseudo-scientific (not authentic or sincere, in spite of appearances?) … no that won’t do. I think teaching what we do know, is what we should be teaching in all classes but that doesn’t seem to be the case.

on May 23, 2011

MyfistO,

Good to have you enter the discussion.

Regarding Isaias 40:21-22, I wrote:

lulapilgrim
Actually more than a couple thousand years ago, people knew the earth was a globe thanks to the writings of Isaias, one of God's prophets. He lived in the time of Hezekiah, King of Judah in 716-687 BC. Isaias was killed (martyred for the faith) by being sawed in half by his son-in-law, King Manasses. God knew the earth was a globe; after all, He created it that way. God inspired Isaias to write His prophecy.

Check out Isaias 40:21-22.

It states, "Do you not know? Hath it not been heard? Hath it not been told you from the beginning? Hath you not understood the foundations of the Earth? It is he that sits upon the globe of the earth....."

So there you have it...sometime between 716 and 687 BC when Isaias penned God's prophecy, they knew the earth was a globe.

myfist0
21 Do you not know?
Have you not heard?
Has it not been told you from the beginning?
Have you not understood since the earth was founded?
22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth,
and its people are like grasshoppers.
He stretches out the heavens like a canopy,
and spreads them out like a tent to live in.

I have 3 different bibles and they all read the same way.

I too own several different Bibles and know that the word "globe" was translated to the word "circle". 

However, since "all Scripture, inspired of God is profitable to teach, to reprove, to correct, and to instruct in justice..." , I  quoted the Douay Rheims version and for good reason. It's the most accurate translation of St.Jerome's Latin Vulgate Bible (405 AD), which is a word-for-word translation from the original Hebrew and Greek. St. Jerome was a consummate linguistic genius, Greek speaking from birth, knew Hebrew and Latin perfectly and had many manuscripts to work from that are no longer extant. I believe he was raised up by God to translate Scripture into common Latin.

In my comment #70 I gave a little background about the Douay Rheims and the Septuagint.

I'm convinced the word "globe" is the original word in Isaias because the Hebrew text forms part of the Dead Sea Scrolls found in Qumram and the Greek version of Isaias in the Septuagint is the same as the Hebrew text. (Masoretic).

myfist0
I think you need to look up the difference between circle and globe.

As I see it, the difference in this case isn't that much of a difference at all.

BT said: A couple thousand years ago the world was flat, everyone knew that. Say, wasn’t that back around the times when your bible was being composed?

Even quoting Isaias with the word "circle" refutes BT's "flat earth" comment.

 

 

 

 

on May 23, 2011

Jerome's Latin Vulgate (405 A.D.)

qui sedet super gyrum terrae et habitatores eius sunt quasi lucustae qui extendit velut nihilum caelos et expandit eos sicut tabernaculum ad inhabitandum

gyrum accusative singular of gȳrus

Latin

Etymology

From Ancient Greek γῦρος (guros)

Pronunciation

  • (Classical) IPA: /ˈɡʏː.rus/

Noun

gȳrus (genitive gȳrī); msecond declension

  1. circle
  2. circular motion
  3. circuitcoursering
  4. (by extension) place where horses are trained

 


Hebrew Transliteration Strong's English
הַיֹּשֵׁב֙ hai·yo·shev 3427 sits
עַל־ al- 5921 above
ח֣וּג chug 2329 the circle
הָאָ֔רֶץ ha·'a·retz, 776 of the earth
וְיֹשְׁבֶ֖יהָ ve·yo·she·vei·ha 3427 inhabitants
כַּחֲגָבִ֑ים ka·cha·ga·vim; 2284 grasshoppers
הַנֹּוטֶ֤ה han·no·v·teh 5186 stretches
כַדֹּק֙ chad·dok 1852 A curtain
שָׁמַ֔יִם sha·ma·yim, 8064 the heavens
וַיִּמְתָּחֵ֥ם vai·yim·ta·chem 4969 and spreads
כָּאֹ֖הֶל ka·'o·hel 168 A tent
לָשָֽׁבֶת׃ la·sha·vet. 3427 to dwell

 

You really want to go there with me?

CIRCLE

1 a round plane figure whose boundary (the circumference) ...

 

PLANE

a flat surface on which a straight line joining any two points on it would wholly...

 


 

Oh and thanks for the welcome. Glad to join the convo.

on May 23, 2011

Lula - St. Augustine (354–430) (Augustine of Hippo), took a more cautious approach in arguing against assuming that people inhabited the antipodes: His scientific reasoning went like this - Since these people would have to be descended from Adam, they would have had to travel to the other side of the Earth at some point; Augustine continues: It is too absurd to say, that some men might have taken ship and traversed the whole wide ocean, and crossed from this side of the world to the other, and that thus even the inhabitants of that distant region are descended from that one first man.

Yea, they thought the world flat alright which was my whole point in the first place. People who believe they live on a pancake do not have the ability to understand to even comprehend the universe around them let alone cover it in your book of books, is all. There is a big difference in knowing something and convincing the other Neanderthals is entirely another matter heresy being what it was then. Globe my eye.

21 PagesFirst 4 5 6 7 8  Last