Is Judging One Another a Modern Sin?
Published on April 10, 2007 By lulapilgrim In Religion
Over the last few days, there have been some rather lively discussions concerning leading “unGodly” lives and obeying the Ten Commandments of Almighty God or not.

I want to thank THINK ALOUD for posting the following comment: “No one, not you not me not even Prophets and Messengers CAN validate any one of being Godly or not. God did not delegate that job to anyone and HE reserves that for HIMSELF ONLY.......

hope you get my point. Regardless of anyone's actions or ideas, being Godly or not is not anyone's but God's call.

every one has the right to explain their faith, however no one can make the judgement on whether others are a believer in God or not. ungodly is a very serious description.”


I'm glad that ThinkAloud brought this up because it goes to the heart of the matter and can be very useful in discussing whether or not we should, indeed have the right, to speak up to the words, actions and deeds of our political leaders, our sports and entertainment figures, our family members and friends, and even those here on JU who think that they can do their own thing or “say” whatever they want without any moral accountability.

Let’s start by turning it around to the positive. Certainly no one would object to someone saying, "So and so leads a Godly life" if thought it to be true? Why? Because it is a positive judgmental call. However, when someone correctly judges someone else’s behavior negatively, the sparks fly. Why? Should they? Do we have the right to judge or not?

We don’t like it when someone admonishes the sinner because that would be “judgmental” or “intolerant”. We don’t instruct the ignorant because people have to find out for themselves. We don’t seek to counsel the doubtful (sinner) because that would be imposing our moral view. No one likes to be told that what they are doing is wrong. Yet, believe it or not, these are acts of mercy and love that come in part from Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount where He taught the Beatitudes. For Catholics, these works of mercy come under the heading of loving the poor and also called “Corporal and Spiritual Works of Mercy”. These are charitable actions by which we come to the aid of our neighbors in their bodily and spiritual needs. The spiritual works of mercy include instructing (teaching), advising, consoling, comforting, forgiving, and patiently forbearing. Corporal works of mercy include feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting the sick and imprisoned, sheltering the homeless, and burying the dead. These charitable works don’t apply only to Catholics; rather they apply to all of us universally.

Here, the meaning of the word “poor” has a deeper, fuller meaning. It extends not only to material poverty but also to the many forms of cultural and “spiritual” poverty. A good example, is babies in the womb are “poor”. (When I write to my congressman and ask that he not vote for abortion, I am performing a spiritual work of mercy for the “poor” congressman and babe in the womb.) God blesses those who come to the aid of the poor and rebukes those who turn away from them. It is by what we have done for the poor that Jesus will recognize His chosen ones. St.Matt 25:31-36.

So, to answer my own question, we should charitably judge another’s words or actions (behavior). Speaking directly to being a Christian and referring to situations here on JU, our task is to speak the saving truth to them in charity and to call upon them to reform their lives.

All of us, Christians and non-Christians, most definitely are called to judge one an other’s behavior, actions, words, and deeds, BUT NEVER A PERSON’S THOUGHTS, CONSCIENCE, HEART OR SOUL AS ONLY GOD OUR CREATOR HAS THE RIGHT IN INFINITE JUSTICE TO JUDGE. So, yes, it is our rightful lawful authority to judge behavior. We do this day in and day out. This is the way we teach our children right from wrong, good from bad. This is the way the magistrates of the court operate and the basis of determining most of our laws and contracts....all are based on our words or actions. It is clearly incumbent upon us to judge.


Some of you will say, what about Jesus’ command to “not judge and you will not be judged” which is immediately followed by “Do not condemn and you will not be condemned”? Should we leave the way open for wrong-doing with impunity? No. The second phrase explains the meaning of the first one. Father Cantalamessa explained it this way. It does not so much remove judgment from our lives as it does to remove the poison from our judgment. That is, that part of our judgment which is resentment, rejection, and revenge, which often is mixed in with the objective evaluation of the deed. The word of God prohibits ruthless judgments, judgments that are merciless.

In a Jan. 2004, New Oxford Review article, Dr. R. Coomaraswamy, Professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, NY wrote in part,

“Now, if we were not to make judgments, how could we decide to be Catholic versus Protestant or some other strange religion? It is clearly incumbent upon us to judge. There is a clear distinction between judging an action, and the motives behind such actions. We can clearly see the act, but it is difficult to understand what motivated it. In other words, we can judge the act, but not the soul, for it is in the soul that motives lie---the latter, thank God, is up to God.

.....Jesus’ statement in Matthew 7:1, Judge not, that ye be not judged is pertinent: “Christ does not here prohibit the public judgments of magistrates, by which they condemn the guilty and absolve the innocent, for this is necessary in all commonwealths, but only in private judgments, and that when they are rash, envious, or distractive, for such are repugnant to charity and justice...Hear St.Augustine (Serm.De Temp., 102) ‘Concerning those things, then, which are known to God, unknown to us, we judge our neighbors at peril. Of this, the Lord has said Judge not. But concerning things which are open and public evils, we may and ought to judge and rebuke, but still with charity and love, hating not the man, but the sin, detesting not the sick man, but the disease. For unless the open adulterer, thief, habitual drunkard, traitor [and may we add homosexual] were judged and punished, then that would be fulfilled which the blessed martyr Cyprian hath said: “He who soothes a sinner with flattering words, administers fuel to his sin.””
“Reprinted with permission from NEW OXFORD REVIEW, 1069 Kains Ave. Berkeley, CA 94706, USA.

Finally, there is the matter of self-judgment----one of the most important judgment calls that we all must render.


Many passages in Sacred Scripture indicate times when we must judge. From the Douay Rheims Version and the NAB these include:

1Cor.5:11-13--------- But now I have written to you, not to keep company, if any man that is named a brother, be a fornicator, or covetous, or a server of idols, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner: with such a one , not so much as to eat. For what have I to do to judge them that are without? Do not you judge them that are within? For them that are without, God will judge. Put away the evil one from yourselves.

6:1-5--------Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to be judged before the unjust , and not before the saints? Know you not that the Saints shall judge this world? And if the world shall be judged by you, are you unworthy to judge the smallest matters? Know you not that we shall judge angels? how much more things of this world? If therefore you have judgments of things pertaining to this world, set them to judge, who are the most despised in the church. I speak to your shame. Is it so that there is none among you any one wise man that is able to judge between his brethren?

2St.John 10-11-------------------If any man come to you and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house nor say to him, God speed you. For he that saith unto him, God speed you, communicateth with his wicked works.

3St.John9------When Michael the archangel, disputing with the devil, contended about the body of Moses, he durst not bring about him the judgment of railing speech, but said: The Lord command thee.

Leviticus 19:15------Thou shalt not do that which is unjust, nor judge unjustly. Shew neither partiality to the weak nor deference to the mighty. But judge thy neighbor according to justice.

19:17-------Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thy heart, but reprove him openly, lest thou incur sin through him.

St.Luke 12:57-59-----And why even of yourselves, do you not judge that which is just? And when thou goest with thy adversary to the prince, whilst thou art in the way, endeavor to be delivered from him: lest perhaps he draw thee to the judge, and the judge deliver thee to the exacter, and the exacter cast thee into prison. I say to thee, thou shalt not go out thence, until thou pay the very last mite.

Comments (Page 3)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on Apr 13, 2007
KFC POSTS IN RESPONSE TO SODAIHO:
In the dictionary to discern means: "to perceive by the sight of some other sense or by the intellect; to see, recognize or apprehend. To distinguish mentally, recognize as distinct or different."


From a Christian POV we are called to be discerning. We're actually warned about this. For instance John (the Apostle of Love) said this in 1 John 4:1:

"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God, because many false prophets are gone out into the world."

Discernment is the necessary element to be able to do this. We are called to be as wise as serpents but harmless as doves.

The writer to the Hebrews said this:

"Solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to discern good from evil." Heb 5:14.



I appreciate your reply to Sodaiho. I would have said something very similiar but not thought of using the dictionary which alone gives us a good idea what discerning means. The two Scripture passages clinch the importance of discernment. I'm glad that you are not ashamed to confess the Gospel even in the face of those who regard it as weakness, inerrant, nonsense and mythical, da, da, da.

I want to encourage you to keep it up even though I know for sure there will be times that my Catholic "take" will disagree with your "take" on things.
on Apr 13, 2007
The short answer is WE ARE GIVEN OUR AUTHORITY TO JUDGE OUR FELLOW MAN FROM GOD.


The fatal flaw in this argument is that not everyone believes in a God, and that not everyone who does believes in the same God.


Judge not lest you be judged.


I think that is pretty damn straight forward and not open to much in the way of human interpretation. If one is of the Christian faith, then one must accept the teachings of Jesus as the absolute truth, in which case we do not have any "right" to judge one another. Period. Jesus himself said so more than once. To do so is in direct opposition to what Jesus himself taught.
on Apr 13, 2007
You say, QofD, that we come into this world as selfish little creatures. Helpless, but selfish - our survival depends on it. Feed me, change me, hold me, love me – over and over again for years.


I think I'm with QOD on this one Lula. Consider what David said in Psalm 139..."in sin did my mother conceive me."

Also God said in Jeremiah...."the heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked; who can know it?" 17:9 This is the natural condition of man.

We don't have to be taught to do wicked...we do it naturally. We have to be taught to do good, not the other way around. The first thing our kids learn from us is the word "no." We teach them not to fight, not to lie, not to steal, etc.


(I'm assuming,Little Whip, that your skit referred to KFC), if so


again, I don't know what she's talking about. My last entry (with questions) was directed to two earlier replies (not her) that had not one question in them. Of course, as usual, I'm not going to quit my day job waiting for answers.

I'm glad that you are not ashamed to confess the Gospel even in the face of those who regard it as weakness, inerrant, nonsense and mythical, da, da, da.


it goes with the territory. Hey, it gets discouraging from time to time, sometimes a lot, but it's where God has me right now and I'm not ashamed of the gospel.

I want to encourage you to keep it up even though I know for sure there will be times that my Catholic "take" will disagree with your "take" on things.


heh!! Thanks. I agree more with you than I do some of those that are "so called" Christians of the Protestant persuasion on here. But ya, we will have to agree to disagree especially when it comes to religious traditions. You know me, sola scriptora all the way.

I look forward to your next article.









on Apr 13, 2007
She's explained. She's justified. She's reiterated. She's backpedaled. And she's outright denied saying it. You pick.


I've explained...yes. Probably even justified...maybe. Backpedaled? NOPE. Denied saying what? You're wrong again LW.

What she's never done, (or even considered, as far as i can tell) is apologize.


Apologized for what? Asking a question that certainly touched a nerve? Why is that? Is it because it rings of truth? Only you know the answer. Actually I did apologize for the time lapse in responding to you. So again, you fail to mention that.

You're the one that has been dogging me for the past year. All anyone has to do is go on to my blogs and check out the comments made by you. Then they can go on your blogs and check any (if they can find any) comments I've left on your blogs. I have repeatedly asked you, even pleaded with you to stay away from my site but you refused. You're a trouble maker and will not be content until you either turn everyone against me, or just have me throw up my hands and just leave. Isn't that the truth LW? The truth is, you're chasing me around...not the other way around.

Pretty simple.

I've yet to flame anyone LW. Everytime there's a fight or argument around here, you're in the middle of it. And you don't quit until you get your own way.

MASON:

If one is of the Christian faith, then one must accept the teachings of Jesus as the absolute truth, in which case we do not have any "right" to judge one another. Period. Jesus himself said so more than once. To do so is in direct opposition to what Jesus himself taught.


That's just it. People only use that one verse and use it incorrectly. Jesus never intended for us NOT to judge. He only intended us to judge RIGHTLY. He said "when you judge, FIRST pick the beam out of your own eye." Basically he's saying.....don't judge with hypocricy or malice. Make sure you're not guilty of the same sin you're accusing another of. Make sure your motives are clear.

Consider this: Jesus also said "Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment." John 7:24

We make judgments everyday from the minute our feet touch the ground. It's ok to do that but not with hypocricy. When dealing with others especially we need to check our motivation first. Is it to help and encourage or is it something else?
on Apr 14, 2007
Basically he's saying.....don't judge with hypocricy or malice. Make sure you're not guilty of the same sin you're accusing another of. Make sure your motives are clear.


Quite a handy interpretation.

He said "when you judge, FIRST pick the beam out of your own eye."


Handy misquote.

I love the way some folks misquote or "interpret" to justify themselves.

on Apr 14, 2007
Using your example of how the bigger, older kids (say 9 yr. olds)pushed and grabbed eggs from the little ones. Don’t you think that deep inside themselves in their heart of hearts these older kids knew they were doing wrong? I think they do.
Let’s take your example further. We’ll take the 9 year olds and place them in the same contest with older teenagers pushing and shoving them in the same manner. They would suddenly realize (the N-Law) the golden rule comes into play. “Do good unto others as you would have them do good unto you.”


By this very example you are reiterating what I said. We learn to be good. The 9 year olds learn what it's like to be pushed by the older kids. They learn what it feels like to be picked on and sometimes decide that they don't want to treat others that way.
on Apr 14, 2007
QUESTION OF THE DAY POSTS:

By this very example you are reiterating what I said. We learn to be good. The 9 year olds learn what it's like to be pushed by the older kids. They learn what it feels like to be picked on and sometimes decide that they don't want to treat others that way.



Yes, I agree when I wrote, "There is no doubt, QofD, that right and wrong are learned throughout our lives." We learn to be good and we learn to be bad through example and modeling of others.

on Apr 14, 2007
He said "when you judge, FIRST pick the beam out of your own eye."


Handy misquote.

I love the way some folks misquote or "interpret" to justify themselves.


You didn't show me how I misquoted this. Well, when ever there's a disagreement about something you go back to it, back to the foundation right? Let's do that. This is EXACTLY what it says:

Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, "Let me take the speck out of your eye," when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, FIRST take the plank out of your own eye and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."

so there you have it Mason. I'm not justifying anything. I'm giving you the truth. Do what you want with it. But it's clear. Jesus NEVER told us NOT to judge. He said that when you do you do it rightly. That's why the other scriptures get ignored like the one I gave you in John.

Like I've said before, Matt 7:1 is the most quoted and overused scripture today. It used to be John 3:16 but that's changed now. People don't want to be told they need to change. They want to stay where they are most comfortable. That's why this verse is so well known. They may not know the bible, but they know this verse.

Jesus calls us out of our comfort zone. I may not like it myself, but I do recogniize the necessity of it.
on Apr 14, 2007
MASON M POSTS:
Judge not lest you be judged.


I think that is pretty damn straight forward and not open to much in the way of human interpretation. If one is of the Christian faith, then one must accept the teachings of Jesus as the absolute truth, in which case we do not have any "right" to judge one another. Period. Jesus himself said so more than once. To do so is in direct opposition to what Jesus himself taught.



The imperative "Judge not" can mean either to resist or to desist from a certain course of action. In either case, Jesus is condemning the kinds of judgments common among the Pharisees who thinking they were superior, falsely judged the actions of others. Jesus is teaching this kind of judgment is wrong and not that judging one another is wrong.

So, Jesus isn't outrightly condemning judging, since in other places, judgment is demanded. I referred to some of those in the body of my article. KFC has added St.John 7:24 in which we learn there is no doubt that we are to judge one another's words, actions and deeds with the provision we that we judging rightly, or with justice or justly.

The general guiding principle is found in St.Matt 7:12 which is true even for even those who don't believe in God or the non-religious "whatever you wish men should do to you, you also do to them."

on Apr 14, 2007
KFC POSTS:
Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, "Let me take the speck out of your eye," when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, FIRST take the plank out of your own eye and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."

so there you have it Mason. I'm not justifying anything. I'm giving you the truth. Do what you want with it. But it's clear. Jesus NEVER told us NOT to judge. He said that when you do you do it rightly. That's why the other scriptures get ignored like the one I gave you in John.


For sure, St.John 7:24 gets ignored. This one about the speck and the plank, "the mote and the beam" in Catholic version comes from Christ's Sermon on the Mount. In His Sermon especially in the Beatitudes, Our Lord proclaims the ruling maxims of His kingdom. What He was saying was utterly unheard of...and coming straight from God. Imagine that!

Catholic interpretation of the speck-beam and Judge not is essentially this. One who finds fault with others, must make sure that he himself is better than and not doing what they are.

We are also to distinguish between the "speck" as the very smallest faults of our neighbor and the "beam" as the great faults which we ourselves commit. Here we find that those who have great faults of their own are the ones who judge the small faults of their neighbors most severely, not at all remembering their own short-comings. The distinction between speck and beam teaches us there is a great difference between one kind of sin and another.

We are not to have false suspicions and make rash judgments. We are not to judge hearts, souls, or conscience. When we do judge, we must judge justly and never even suspect bad of them without sufficient reason or the most conclusive proofs that the supposed evil is a fact. Only with sufficient reason and conclusive proof, do we judge.

on Apr 14, 2007
LITTLE WHIP POSTS:
In my three years here (and over 600 articles, I've deleted more than I have available now) I have avoided the Religion forums like I avoid public toilets, only entering on the rare occasions when the need for release was so compelling as to temporarily distract me from the malodorous and unhygienic conditions within.

It's all the same to me, lula. Hail the Whore of Babylon!



I'm not into playing games so I'll give you two choices: 1) Take your drama queen act somewhere else where they will enjoy the show

OR

2) stay with us and show some respect, honoring both yourself and the others involved in the discussion.
on Apr 14, 2007
Question of the Day posts:
You say, QofD, that we come into this world as selfish little creatures. Helpless, but selfish - our survival depends on it. Feed me, change me, hold me, love me – over and over again for years.


KFC POSTS:
I think I'm with QOD on this one Lula. Consider what David said in Psalm 139..."in sin did my mother conceive me."



I found this passage in Ps 51:5...(and I don't navigate Scripture like you do, so it took me awhile, but good practice for me)! Catholic interpretation goes to the context of the entire Psalm with David's repentance and confession of his sin. He's saying that he's always been afflicted with sin...since his birth starting with the effects of Original Sin. This is true and we, from birth are all prone to sin. We have a fallen nature. We agree on this.


We don't have to be taught to do wicked...we do it naturally. We have to be taught to do good, not the other way around. The first thing our kids learn from us is the word "no." We teach them not to fight, not to lie, not to steal, etc.



We don't agree on this however.

Okay, think of the Natural Law written on our heart as that inner voice of "conscience"; that inner voice written on our heart. From the moment of our birth, there is an inner sense of right and wrong. We know interiorly when we are doing wrong. Something rebukes us. We (naturally)know when we are going against that inner voice. We can't escape it, it's there. It's the Natural Law or that inner voice of conscience dictating to us a law that we didn't make and couldn't make. This inner voice protests deep inside us. This inner voice is quite often against what we wish to do warning us beforehand.

The (Natural) Law dictated by this inner voice supposes a Lawgiver who has written His law on our hearts.
on Apr 14, 2007
Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, "Let me take the speck out of your eye," when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, FIRST take the plank out of your own eye and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."


Yes, that is the correct quote now.

The meaning is quite clear that you may not judge another as long as you yourself have faults. So only those who are perfect and without fault may judge another. I'm willing to bet that isn't anyone here. Let he (or she) who is without fault cast the first stone.
on Apr 15, 2007
Okay, think of the Natural Law written on our heart as that inner voice of "conscience"; that inner voice written on our heart. From the moment of our birth, there is an inner sense of right and wrong. We know interiorly when we are doing wrong. Something rebukes us. We (naturally)know when we are going against that inner voice. We can't escape it, it's there. It's the Natural Law or that inner voice of conscience dictating to us a law that we didn't make and couldn't make. This inner voice protests deep inside us. This inner voice is quite often against what we wish to do warning us beforehand.


I know what you're saying Lula but this is not biblical. The biblical way is that we are born sinners. What you are referring to here is the conscience. That's diff. The conscience is something that is developed. We are born with a conscience as blank slates and depending on what is placed there is how we react later on in life.

What you're talking about is your training. You were taught as a young child the diff between right and wrong based on God's laws.

For instance in some cultures it's perfectly ok to be cannibals. Their conscience is clear. Over the years I've read of cultures that had savage belief systems because that's how they were taught. It didn't go against their conscience to act this way because it was ingrained at a young age.

Look at the Muslim culture. Some of what they believe when it comes to women seems wrong to us. But to them it's ok and normal practice. It doesn't go against their conscience at all to treat women in such a way that we might consider to go against our conscience here in this country. It's all in the training.


So only those who are perfect and without fault may judge another.


nobody is perfect. So we agree on this one Mason. But we are to make RIGHT judgments and to be very careful that we do so for the RIGHT reasons. Motivation of the heart is what God looks at anyhow. He knows what drives us.

Let he (or she) who is without fault cast the first stone.


I was actually talking to someone today about this. We were talking about what Jesus was writing in the sand. I believe (my opinion) he was writing the names of the men's girlfriends in the sand. That's why the older men dropped their stones and left first. This is a good example of not judging with hypocricy.




on Apr 16, 2007
Okay, think of the Natural Law written on our heart as that inner voice of "conscience"; that inner voice written on our heart. From the moment of our birth, there is an inner sense of right and wrong. We know interiorly when we are doing wrong. Something rebukes us. We (naturally)know when we are going against that inner voice. We can't escape it, it's there. It's the Natural Law or that inner voice of conscience dictating to us a law that we didn't make and couldn't make. This inner voice protests deep inside us. This inner voice is quite often against what we wish to do warning us beforehand.


I know what you're saying Lula but this is not biblical. The biblical way is that we are born sinners. What you are referring to here is the conscience. That's diff. The conscience is something that is developed. We are born with a conscience as blank slates and depending on what is placed there is how we react later on in life.

What you're talking about is your training. You were taught as a young child the diff between right and wrong based on God's laws.

For instance in some cultures it's perfectly ok to be cannibals. Their conscience is clear. Over the years I've read of cultures that had savage belief systems because that's how they were taught. It didn't go against their conscience to act this way because it was ingrained at a young age.

Look at the Muslim culture. Some of what they believe when it comes to women seems wrong to us. But to them it's ok and normal practice. It doesn't go against their conscience at all to treat women in such a way that we might consider to go against our conscience here in this country. It's all in the training.





A couple of things.

In hindsight, it might have been better had I not have explained my position on the natural law by bringing in conscience. They are altogether two different things, yet work together in our lives. I agree with your comments on conscience. While both the natural law and conscience are parts of our nature, the natural law is of divine origin and intrinsically a part of us that can’t be changed while our conscience through life experience is formed--- for the good or for the bad. The natural law and conscience both repudiate immoral civil laws.


The Eternal Law (sometimes called the Whole Law), is God’s divine will and providence governing His entire Creation----the cosmos and all of nature, including man. Man stands apart from the rest of nature because God created him in His image and likeness of God (soul), of his free will, and his intellect (ability to reason).

The Natural Law is biblical. It goes back to the beginning when “God saw that all He had made was very good.” Gen.1:31. Nature was created by God and mankind is the highest form of nature or the pinnacle of His Creation. God’s imprint of the natural law written on man’s heart tends for man’s natural reason to do good and avoid evil. Yes, for sure we have fallen nature due to Original Sin and we must deal with that by following God’s revealed laws.

God in the Infinite Mercy and Love of His Eternal Law gave those people who lived before His Revelation, a sense of right and wrong through the natural law He had written in their hearts. St.Paul, Apostle of the Gentiles, wrote that the natural law is inscribed in the hearts of all men, even though all do not have the Law (of Sinai) of divine Revelation. Romans 2:12-16.

Romans 2:12-16, “All who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law. 13 For it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be justified. 14 When Gentiles who have not the law do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. 15 They show that what the law requires is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or perhaps excuse them..”

My understanding of St.Paul’s teaching is that the Jews received the Law from God through Moses. The pagans or Gentiles knew right from wrong only received through the exercise of reason. By acting in accordance with nature they adhered to the same moral precepts as God specified in the Ten Commandments. For pagans, the natural law was a law to themselves, a law applying to them by virtue of what is written on their heart.

What God requires of everyone is that he keep the natural law that is written on the heart and engraved in the mind (conscience) of every one of us. This is our reason commanding us to do right and forbidding sin.

The Church teaches that even though human reason is in theory capable of grasping the natural law written on our heart by our Creator, many factors prevent us from obeying that law. Our senses, our imagination, our evil desires, all deriving from the effects of Original Sin give rise to difficulties. As a result, people can easily convince themselves that what they do not want to accept as the right thing to do is in fact the wrong thing or at least that the matter is in doubt.

When St.Paul says that the Gentiles keep the law if they follow the dictates of nature, he does not mean that supernatural grace is not necessary for salvation. Human nature has been wounded by Original Sin, but it is not completely vitiated for the likeness of God impressed upon the human soul cannot be destroyed by a human’s attachment to earthly things to the point that it does not retain even the faintest traces of that likeness and so it is correct to say that a sinner is always aware of and does keep some part of the Law.

Without the help of supernatural grace it is impossible to keep all the precepts of the natural law all the time.





4 Pages1 2 3 4