By Meg Jalsevac 

  HARRISBURG, PA, January 19, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) – A letter addressed to Massachusetts’ ex-governor Mitt Romney has just been made public in which 44 conservative, pro-family leaders from across the nation requested that before stepping down from office, Romney would adhere to the Massachusetts Constitution and repeal his order directing public officials to perform ‘same-sex marriages’.  

  The letter was hand delivered to members of Romney’s staff on December 20th, 2006 at his office.  Romney took no action to adhere to the letter’s requests before he left office at the beginning of the New Year. 

  The letter cited numerous, historical cases and the Massachusetts’ Constitution to assert that Romney’s actions in implementing ‘gay marriage’ were beyond the bounds of his authority as governor. The authors further asserted that his actions were unconstitutional as were the actions of the four initial judges who formulated the official opinion on the matter in the ‘Goodridge’ case, the case that originally brought the matter to national attention.

  Commenting on the ‘Goodridge’ opinion, Judge Robert Bork said that it was “untethered to either the Massachusetts or United States Constitution.”

  As quoted in the letter, the MA Constitution denies the judicial branch of its government any authority over the state’s marriage policies.  So it was that three of the seven judges that heard the Goodrich case strongly dissented that the court did not have authority to formulate laws.

  The letter also outlined how the MA Constitution forbids judges from establishing or altering law.  According to the Constitution, such a task is to be left to the legislature.  The judges’ opinion in the Goodrich case admitted that they were not altering the standing marriage statute in MA.  

  Instead, Governor Romney took it upon himself, despite legal counsel to do otherwise, to order officials across the state that they would have to perform ‘gay marriages’, even though, according to Massachusetts law, to do so is a crime. Officials who refused were advised to resign their position.

  Throughout the whole ordeal, Romney maintained that he was personally against ‘homosexual marriage’ but that he must “execute the law.”  The conservatives’ letter clearly illustrates how Romney was not “executing the law” but merely facilitating the agenda of activist judges – beyond even the judges’ own expectations.

  The letter clearly explained how Romney’s actions, in reality, are a crime under Massachusetts  because of his oath to uphold the Constitution.

-------------------------------------------------

lulapilgrim
Quoting Smoothseas, reply 45
Your bigotry and ignorance truly shine here.

Smoothseas
You're homophobic and a religious bigot Lulu.

Knock, knock, Smoothseas. These are facts, some hard facts why I oppose Romney for President. Romney's history and shaky convictions have made me wary of his stability as a GOP presidential nominee.

It's not bigotry, not ignorance and not homophobia.