Published on April 1, 2010 By lulapilgrim In Current Events

 

A Must See! A 10 minute video meditation on the various wounds of sin which plague humanity, wounds that were borne by Jesus on the Cross. The drama of Christ's Passion shows how Divine Mercy bore our wounds and wants to heal us. An Excellent Lenten preparation for the Sacred Triduum!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrFBX03Bnno

 


Comments (Page 26)
27 PagesFirst 24 25 26 27 
on May 19, 2010

The Catholic Chruch is the Mystical Body of Christ.

And you eat his body. Cannibals.

on May 19, 2010

Leauki posts 357

Catholicism is all about top-to-bottom.

If you are referring to the authoritative hierarchy, yes,.... it's set up much like the authoritative hierarchy in Biblical Judaism.

In the Old Covenant, there was the Chair of Moses...In the New Covenant, there is the Chair of Peter of which Pope Benedict XVI is now gloriously reigning.

By God's command Moses prescribed what sacrifices were to be offered together with the manner of offering them and the times they were to be offered. And By God's command the Jewish hierarchial priesthood was established.

Moses consecrated AAron as High Priest, his sons as priests, and the other men of the tribe of Levi as ministers of the Sanctuary.

Just as the New Covenant priesthood, Aaron wore sacred sacerdotal vestments as did all Old Covenant priests. Robes reaching down to their ankles, a girdle of linen as well as a turban or mitre with the inscription, HOly to the Lord." 

As to the ministers, at first it was the first born son who had been set apart for the service of GOd, but afterwards, a special priesthood had been set up, the tribe of Levi was chosen for the priestly office and the service of the Tabernacle.  

The priestly office was hereditary in Aaron's family. The first born of this family was always to be the High Priest, and the other male descendants priests. The other men of the tribe of Levi were to assist the priests in the service of God and were known as Levites.

The High Priest was the spiritual head of the people, the visible representative of the Lord God, and the mediator between the Lord God and the people. He had the privilege of entering the Holy of Holies once a year, and later on, of anointing of kings. As there in the Old Covanent, there was only one High Priest, so the New Covenant Church has only one High Priest, Bishop of bishops, the Pope who is the visible head of our invisible Eternal Supreme High Priest, Jesus Christ.

The Priests had the right and the duty to offer sacrifice, to enter the Sanctuary,  to keep burning the lights of the 7-branched candlestick, and the sacred fire for the burnt offerings. to bless the people and pray for them, and to instruct them in the law. the Hierarchial graduation in Christ's Chruch is twofold ....one of order...Bishops or High Priest, Priests and deacons or ministers. and one of jurisdiction....i.e. power of ruling. Pope, Patriarchs,Archbishops or Metropolitians, bishops and priests.

The Christian priesthood is far higher than the Jewish priesthood. The Jewish priesthood was propagated by natural descent, the Christian priesthood is perpetuated by spiritual descent i.e. by means of the imposition of hands, aka Holy Orders which is one of the 7 Sacraments.

The Jewish priests could only offer typical sacrifices. Christian priests offer up the the true Lamb of GOd who takes away sins. The Jewish partook of earthly meat-offerings, The Christian receive the priceless Flesh and Blood of the Divine Savior. The Jewish priests prayed for the people, the Christian priests remember them daily in the holy Sacrifice of the Mass.

So, here it's plain to see the authoritative hierarchial priesthood of the OLd Covenant was a "type" of the priesthood in the New Covenant. As their was a hierarchial graduation in the OC, there is in the New Covenant priesthood.  

 

 

on May 19, 2010

kfc posts:

exactly. There is no hierachy in the Christian faith.

Ah, the true Protestant viewpoint.

Yes, there is a hierarchy in the Christian Faith and all Protestants p-r-o-t-e-s-t against it.

Christ terms His Chruch a kingdom which supposes some organized sacerdotal authority. The explicit steps in establishing of an authoritative hierarchy are clear. Christ chose certain special men. "You have not chosen Me but I have chosen you.". He gave them His own mission, "As the Father has sent Me, I also send you."  This commission included His teaching authority, "teach all nations....whatsoever I have commanded you." as well as His power to sanctify, "..Baptizing them.."  and to forgive sin, "Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven." and to offer sacrifice, "Do this for a commemmoration of Me." His legislative or disciplinary power. "He who hears you, hears Me, and he who despises you, despises Me."   "Whatsoever you shall bind on earth, shall be bound also in Heaven." If a man will not hear the Chruch, let him be unto thee as the  heathen." The Apostles certainly exercised these powers from the beginning. The Book of Acts is proof. St.Paul himself excommunicated the incestuous Corinthian and he wote to the Hebrews, "obey your prelates and be subject to them. 13:17.

The Apostles were ordained by Jesus Christ. He personally called them apart from other men to fulfill the sacred duties of the ministry He established.

As I have just shown, Christ endowed them with priestly power to preach, to forgive sin in His name, to offer the Sacrifice of the Holy Mass, and as He reigns from Heaven for them to rule His Church, His kingdom on earth.

Christ also endowed them with the power to ordain other priests to continue the ministry of the one, true Christian religion. They were to be "bishops" or "Shepherds" of the Christian flock. The "Bishops" are those who have received by transmission from the Apostles and from Christ, the plentitude of the Christian priesthood by "the imposition of hands."  Jesus Himself is the Eternal High Priest with an absolute plenitude of priestly power. St. Peter teaches that Jesus Himself was the Supreme Bishops of souls, ordained the Apostles and originated episcopal power in the first representatives of the Christian priesthood as we know and have today.

And the Apostles ordained others to continue the mission of the Church. St.Paul wrote to Titus, "For this cause I left thee in Crete, that thou shouldst ordain priests in every city as I appointed thee. Titus 1:5.    

on May 20, 2010

lula posts 371

Remember you said the Messias must bring peace and I said He already did for those who accept Him.

Leauki posts:

 Everyone did that. I can myself tell people not to fight and claim that I brought world peace since everybody who follows my command is not fighting any more.

In Christ's discourse with His Apostles after the Last Supper, He said to them, "Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you; not as the world gives, do I give unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, nor let it be afraid."

Christ's peace is one of the great messianic gifts. The peace Jesus gives us completely transcends the peace of the world which can be superficial, misleading and compatible with injustice. The peace of Christ is above all, reconciliation with God and reconciliation of men with one another and it is one of the fruits of the Holy Spirit (sorry, here I go again talking in language you most probably don't understand!).

Christ exhorted His disciples that is also a command, "Have peace among you." That exhortation is addressed also to us. Let us keep peace in our own little world..in our family, in our circle of friends and acquaintances, in our work, in our neighborhood, in our community, in our society.

St.Paul said, "If it be possible, as much as is in you, have peace with all men."  

Leauki posts:

And the Catholic Church has never been a big help either.

Practically every Pope has written encyclicals on the subject of peace ...in the individual, in the family as well as societal.

Here's part of what Pope John Paul II wrote back in September 1979,

"Christ is our peace. Eph. 2:14, And today and forever He repeats to us My peace I give to you, My Peace I leave with you. Never before in the history of mankind has peace been so much talked about and so ardently desired as in our day. And yet, again and again, one can see how peace is undermined and destoyed.

Peace is the result of many converging attitudes and realities. It is the product of moral concerns, of ethical principles, based on the Gospel message and fortified by it. In his message for the 1971 Day of Peace, my revered predeccessor, Pope Paul VI, said: true peace must be founded upon justice, upon the sense of the untouchable dignity of man, upon the recognition of an indelible and happy equality between men, upon the basic principle of human brotherhood, that is of the respect and true love due each man, becasue he is man."

This same message I affirmed in Mexico and Poland. I reaffirm it here in Ireland. Every human being has inalienable rights that must be respected. each human community--ethnic, historical, cultural or religious---has rights which must be respected. Peace is threatened every time one of these rights is violated.  

The moral law, guardian of human rights, protector of the dignity of man, cannot be set aside by any person, group or by the State itself, for any cause, not even for security or in the interests of law and order. The law of God stands in judgment over all reasons of State. As long as injustices exist in any of the areas that touch upon the dignity of the human person, be it in the political, social or economic field, be it in the cultural or religious sphere, true peace will not exist.

Peace cannot be established by violence. peace can never flourish in a climate of terror, intimidation and death. It is Jesus Himself who said: "All who take the sword will perish by the sword." St.Matt. 26:52. This is the word of God and it commands this generation of violent men to desist from hatred and violence and to repent.  

KFC posts 372

not individually nor corporately. The RCC has NEVER been a picture of peace. Lula refuses to see this. They don't represent Christ AT ALL! They think they do. But instead they represent the Pharisees.

KFC,

I just quoted from 2 Popes...it sounds to me like they hit the nail on the head as far as painting a picture of peace.

Is the spread of Christianity good for the world? I'd say so. Was the Chruch sent by Christ to teach His Gospel to all nations until the end of time? Yes. Did she do it? Yes. It is the Catholic Church who spread the leaven of Christianity and Christianized all of Europe and the better part of Asia that hadn't been been overcome by the advance of Islam. By Christianized I mean the permeation of the ethical, moral and social order of Jesus Christ. Is she still spreading the Good News...yes.

You are so misguided..you really need to stop this calumny against the Church. The Church is not the enemy that you try to portray it to be.  

 

 

on May 20, 2010

They kept listening to Christ talk and all they could dwell on was the physical.

Ya, like you who believes the Dispensaltionalists---Pre-Millennialists endtime fable that Christ will physically govern for a 1,000 year earthly (physical again) reign!  

 

on May 20, 2010

lula posts

In Ephesians 4: 3-6 , St.Paul speaks of maintaining the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace Verses 4-6, "There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call, 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6 one God and Father of us all, who is above all and through all and in all. "

 

kfc posts:

The one body is ALL CHRISTIANS united by the Holy Spirit.

.... It doesn't work with Ephesians 4:3-6. "All Christians" would include all those within the thousands of different Protestant sects..."All these Christians" have proven themselves to be doctrinally different and having different beliefs. Some believe and some don't believe that Jesus is equal to the Father, in the resurrection of Christ, in Heaven, in Hell, that baptism is essential to becoming a Christian, and on and on and on. All this proves there is no unity amongst "ALL Christians" of all the thousands of different sects. For this to be true you must show how all these different sects fit with Ephesians 4:5-6. Save your time...you can't do it...no one can do it for the simple truth is Protestantism is a house divided.....there is no unity.

Like I said, you can't do it.

"ALL CHRISTIANS" would include the Baptist who believes in one kind of baptism

"ALL CHRISTIANS" would include the Episcopalian who believes in a different baptism than the Baptist.

can you see now how your definition of "the one body is ALL CHRISTIANS" violates Ephesians 4:4-6  "one Baptism"?

Yet, there is only "one baptism" in every Catholic Church around the world.

 Protestantism is prone to endless divisions becasue of rival interpretations of the Bible. That's why the Baptists have their own beliefs, the LUtherans have their own beliefs, the Presbyterians their own, the Methodists their own, the Congregationalists their own, and even the self-styled Individualist her own. "All the Christians" in the Baptist Churches are not united in spirit with all the Christians in the Presbyterian Churches and you know it.  

All the Christians in all the different Baptists Churches aren't united in spirit.

Within Protestantism, unity is impossible and the splits just keep coming. 

 

 

on May 20, 2010

If you are referring to the authoritative hierarchy, yes,.... it's set up much like the authoritative hierarchy in Biblical Judaism.

In the Old Covenant, there was the Chair of Moses...In the New Covenant, there is the Chair of Peter of which Pope Benedict XVI is now gloriously reigning.

"Chair of Moses"??? What are you talking about?

What "Chair of Peter"? Why can't you talk like a normal person?

Judaism has a hierarchy whenever the Temple stands. It didn't have a working hierarchy during the Babylonian exile or today, although vestiges remain.

Jesus was against hierarchies and believed that everyone was equal before G-d. That was his criticism of Judaism.

He did certainly not attempt to create a new hierarchy that is even more rigid than the Jewish priest caste system.

 

Practically every Pope has written encyclicals on the subject of peace ...in the individual, in the family as well as societal.

They write one thing, they do another. South-America was not conquered by the word, it was conquered by the sword, and by Catholic rulers supported and encouraged by the Papacy.

 

Ah, the true Protestant viewpoint.

Obviously, KFC is a Protestant.

I can imagine her walk up to the Vatican and protest against the Church's vast commercial interests and its habit of making lots of money while many of its followers live in abject poverty.

Protestants are annoying. They want to change the status quo and they question authority.

We have had people like that in our history in Israel as well, I can tell you that.

 

on May 20, 2010

WORLD PEACE...

leauki posts 183

Still waiting for world peace, the return of all Jews to Israel and the Third Temple... My Messiah will make all these things come about.

kfc 187

This is true Lula but the Prince of Peace will eventually bring in physical peace as well. That's what the Jews are waiting for.

lula 185

This is according to Maimonades. The Messias Christ brought peace...spiritual peace. Jewry thinks in the physical and so they entirely miss

lula posts:

KFC, .....You say, The Prince of Peace (Christ) will eventually bring in physical peace? "Eventually"????

The OT prophets Ezekiel and Isaias prophecied the peace of Christ as well as His Eternal New Covenant of Peace....both have been fulfilled at Christ's First Coming. .....The birth of the new-born Child means peace...Jesus is the Prince of Peace.

Peace includes all God's saving blessings. It is an effect of the Covenant God made with Isreal renewed in Jesus. Jesus Himself is this Peace...the Jews must accept Jesus.

Peace means reconciliation; perfect joy. The message Jesus preaches is the Gospel of peace...again Jesus Himself is this Peace.

Peace is given to men of good will because God has shown them His favor and they are the objects of His good pleasure and it was Jesus who assures us of this. The Angels praised the new-born child as Messias-King, Prince of Peace and the Savior. Go to 19:38. The Angels song is related to the people who accomplanied Jesus on His entry into Jerusalem at the beginning of Holy Week. They said, "Blessed by the King who is coming in the name of the Lord. Peace in Heaven and glory on high." We know His entry into Jerusalem where His death and glorification would bring His work of salvation to an end. The peace of Heaven would be communicated to men after that. The peace that began with Jesus' birth was fully completed at His death and glorification. Christ's peace is the cause and effect of every kind of peace. Any peace on earth not based on this Divine peace would be vain and misleading.

kfc 198

Yes I do say so because that's what scripture says. The peace you're talking about here promised is not given universally to men who possess good will toward God but individually to men who are the recipients of His favor and grace. We are not living in a world of Peace. Look around you. Turn on the news. Only the Prince of Peace (the Messiah for the Jews) can usher in physical peace for the whole world to e

kfc  198

"They shall build houses and inhabit them and they shall plant vineyards and eat the fruit of them. They shall not build and another inhabit; they shall not plant and another eat; for as the days of a tree are the days of my people and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands. They shall not labor in vain, nor bring forth for trouble for they are the seed of the blessed of the Lord and their offspring with them.....The wolf and the lamb shall feed together and the lion shall eat straw like a bull and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain says the Lord." Isa 65:21-25 "and it shall come to pass that from one new moon to another and from one sabbath to another shall all flesh come to worship before me says the Lord." Isa 66:23 "and the Lord shall be king over all the earth in that day shall there be one Lord and his name one...and men shall dwell in it and there shall be NO MORE UTTER DESTRUCTION; but Jerusalem shall be safely inhabited...and it shall come to pass that every one that is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem (not happened yet) shall even go up from year to year to worship the King the Lord of hosts and to keep the feast of tabernacles." Zech 14:9,11,16

This is when he ushers in totally physical peace on earth. This has NOT happened yet. Satan right now is the Prince of the World but not for long. He's been given a long leash but Christ, in his timing, will come back and claim what is now rightfully his. It has nothing to do with his first coming. His first coming brought peace spiritually in the hearts and minds of his elect but has nothing to do with a worldwide physical peace that we will dwell in someday.

 You are right this hasn't happened yet and it won't ever happen. Becasue when Christ ushers in total peace of His kingdom, we will have been already judged, our bodies glorified and ushered into the heavenly realm, the New Jerusalem, the everlasting new heavens and new earth.

kfc posts;

We are living in the times of the Gentiles so that the promise to Abraham might be fulfilled completely that "all nations will be blessed."

You are missing the forest for the trees...that's becasue you think the last three blessings promised are yet to come.

The Prince of Peace has come and redeemed us....Christ's First Coming ushered in the Peace that was promised by the prophets. NO, We are NOT LIVING IN THE TIME OF THE GENTILES, BUT rather in the time of Grace...We are living in the millennial times of the New and Everlasting Covenant of Grace....of which the the Jews (and all unbelievers) if they truly want true peace,  as St.Paul infallibly teaches can still be drafted in..by repenting for their unbelief and being baptized in the New Covenant of Christ.    

The promises of Abraham have been fulfilled completely in his seed, Jesus Christ. All the 6 blessings promised have already been bestowed.

Again your grave errors all center around your false interpretation of Scripture. Whether or not it's your own interpretation or you're getting it from others who believe in Dispensationalism or Pre-Millennialism doesn't matter. The point is it's completely false and dangerous. After Christ's Second Coming, there is no future literal physical 1,000 year reign of Christ on earth.

Christ prayed that we may all be one but He never prayed for this earthly world.

"Now they have known that all things which Thou hast gavest Me, I have given to them; and they have received them and have known in every deed that I came out from Thee, and they have believed that Thou didst send Me. I pray for them: I PRAY NOT FOR THE WORLD, but for them whom Thou hast given Me for they are thine. " St. John 17:7-11 

 

 

on May 20, 2010

 You are right this hasn't happened yet and it won't ever happen. Becasue when Christ ushers in total peace of His kingdom, we will have been already judged, our bodies glorified and ushered into the heavenly realm, the New Jerusalem, the everlasting new heavens and new earth.

That's a cop-out.

Anyone can create world peace if the "world" is not this one.

 

on May 20, 2010

Jesus was against hierarchies and believed that everyone was equal before G-d.

Jesus was not against the Judaic-Christian hierarchies. i've just quoted Scripture which proves He established the New Covenant Christian hierarchy. Jesus is God. Our Lord God established the Old Covenant Jewish hierarchy.

 Again, Jesus wasn't against the Jewish hierarchies, rather He was against the sins committed by the Jewish hierarchies (their unfaithfulness to Him and His law. ). Just as He is against the sins committed by the Christian hierarchies. "Woe to them" the Scriptures teach.  They will be judged more harshly  becasue they were given authority to rule over and guide His people.

Everyone is equal before God. The point is not everyone was/is given equal authority.

By that I mean both the Old Coveant Judaic/New Covenant Christian hierarchies were/was respectively given special religious authority that the lay person was not.

Religion, in the Judaic/Christian Biblical sense of the term, is a system of beliefs and practices that have reference to man's relation with the Lord God and his fellow humans. It must be an authoritative religion, that is a religion of God's making, the only kind of religion that the intrinsic dignity of man warrants him to obey. There have been only 2 such authoritative religions...in fact, one, Catholic Christianity is the historic outgrowth, perfection, of the other Biblical Judaism. Just as there can only be one GOd, so can there be only one religion of God at any time in history. From this it logically follows there can be only one Church of God's making in existence at any one time in the history of mankind; otherwise doctrinal contradiction would result, as exists ourside the Catholic Church.

The enemies of authoritative Biblical Judaism and of the Catholic Church (authoritative Biblical Christianity) who think they think rightly are devoid of this realization.

Putting it all together...

The hierarch of the Old Covenant Jewish Church could rightly command. as it did, in matters of faith and morals as proclaimed by God through Moses, in pre-Christian times when there was a Jewish hierarchy. The Jewish hierarchy was superceded by the hierarch instituted by Jesus, the Son of God, and commanded by Him to function throughout the world, during all time until the end of time.

That hierarchy, misjudged and maligned on these JU pages, was made up in the beginning of 12 Apostles of which Simon-Peter, bearer of the Keys, was the visible head; as AAron the first Jewish High Priest was the original priestly dignitary.

We, Catholics rightly think that that Christian hierarchy exists today. That is can be and has been traced historically back to the Apostles, through the occupants of the Chair of St.Peter...just as the authority of the occupants of the chair of Washington can be traced back historically from Obama to President George Washington.

Right reasoning causes the Catholic laity to accept the mandates of this Christ-delegated hierarchial authority in matters of faith and morals, bearing in mind the fact that Christ, My Lord, commanded them that if they have ears to hear...to hear the Chruch...and if they would not hear the Chruch they would be like the heathen and the publican, condemned. St.Matt. 18.   

Almighty God set up 3 spheres of His authority..the family, with the father as authority, the Chruch with the hierarchial authority, and the government or civil authority. Rebellion against these authorities results in choas, confusion, unhappiness, broken homes, hearts, no peace, and the list goes on and on and on.     

 

on May 20, 2010

Protestants are annoying. They want to change the status quo and they question authority.

Questioning authority is OK...however, when it comes to God's established religious authority such as is the CC, questioning that religious authority is OK too,  but the Protestant's revolted from that authority and established a new religion..and that is not OK.

We must serve Christ as He demanded and He demanded that we "Hear the Chruch which is the pillar and bulwark of truth"  not revolt against it and start up one of our own..as the Protestants did and still do.

This goes directly to my last point...the Protestants rebel against Christ's authoritative Church.

on May 20, 2010

Questioning authority is OK...however, when it comes to God's established religious authority such as is the CC, questioning that religious authority is OK too,  but the Protestant's revolted from that authority and established a new religion..and that is not OK.

Either questioning authority is OK and it is therefor OK to question that the CC is "God's established religious authority" or questioning authority is not OK. But both cannot be true.

Jesus also questioned the authority of the priests. Was that OK or not OK?

And what about those Christians who first announced that the "Messiah" was G-d Himself? That went against everything Jews believed. Was such a questioning of religious authority OK?

 

on May 20, 2010

Like I said, you can't do it.

"ALL CHRISTIANS" would include the Baptist who believes in one kind of baptism

"ALL CHRISTIANS" would include the Episcopalian who believes in a different baptism than the Baptist.

can you see now how your definition of "the one body is ALL CHRISTIANS" violates Ephesians 4:4-6 "one Baptism"?

Yet, there is only "one baptism" in every Catholic Church around the world.

SEE!  You've proved my point yet again!!!  You're still in the physical.  The one baptism has nothing to do with the physical.  One can be "baptized" in any religion and still be part of the one body!  It's not about the physical it's about the spiritual.  You keep going to denominations like Baptist, Catholic, Episcopalian etc.  I keep telling you IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DENOMINATIONS!   Why can't you get this?  It's because you want to be dumb on purpose Lula.  There is NO other explanation.  Christ is NOT A ROMAN CATHOLIC!   When He comes back he's coming  to Jerusalem...NOT ROME! 

In my bible study I sit in front of one of the most spiritual woman I have ever met.  She's a very old black woman who is also an Episcopalian.  But get this.  She goes to my study with a teacher who is a Messianic Jew who also thinks of himself as a Reformed Baptist.  She believes in infant baptism.  I don't.  But guess what?  Our spirits bond.  We mesh.  We are united in the one blood and body of Christ.  Yet she's an Episcopalian and I'm a Baptist. Doesn't matter. 

And what about those Christians who first announced that the "Messiah" was G-d Himself? That went against everything Jews believed. Was such a questioning of religious authority OK?

good questions Leauki.  And what's interesting is the fact that when Paul, an Apostle with great knowledge of the scriptures, preached in Berea those listening didn't even trust his words at face value.  They searched the scriptures to see if Paul was preaching truth.  AND THEY WERE COMMENDED! 

"These were more noble than those in Thessalonica in that they received the word with all readiness of mind and searched the scriptures daily whether those things were so."  Acts 17:11

Dare do that to a Pope!  One Pope when questioned bristled at being questioned and said "I AM Tradition!"

This goes directly to my last point...the Protestants rebel against Christ's authoritative Church.

no they don't.  Only the RCC says it's Chris't authoritive Church.  You've been lied to. 

Does a deceived man know he is deceived?

The phrase "do not be deceived" occurs five times in the New Testament, and the same warning is reiterated in other words in additional verses. The fact that Christians are warned about the possibility of being deceived means it can happen. And the fact that the warning is repeated means we have to look carefully and continually at our lives to make sure we are "[walking] in the light as He is in the light" (1 John 1:7). The best ways to avoid deception are to continually rehearse the Bible's teachings ("Is this what I believe?" Psalm 119:11), continually ask God to search our heart to see if there is any wicked way in it (Psalm 139:23-24), and be accountable to people who love us enough to correct us (Proverbs 27:6).

 

on May 20, 2010

Jesus also questioned the authority of the priests. Was that OK or not OK?

Jesus never questioned the authority of the priesthood. Jesus is the Lord God and the Lord God gave the priests their authority. He railed against their abuse of their authority. That's why He made a whip and drove them out the Temple...they were misusing and abusing their authority profaning the House of God.

Either questioning authority is OK and it is therefor OK to question that the CC is "God's established religious authority" or questioning authority is not OK. But both cannot be true.

Read again what I wrote and note what follows "but".  

Questioning authority is OK...however, when it comes to God's established religious authority such as is the CC, questioning that religious authority is OK too, but the Protestant's revolted from that authority and established their own  religion..and that is not OK.

 

Questioning Catholic Church religious authority is one thing, but quite different from rebelling from it and establishing their own relligion. Not good.  As evidenced from history, Protestantism is prone to endless divisions becasue in the absence of such a central authoritative body there is no unity and the splits only keep coming. And so it will go on.

Protestantism grants the right of private judgment and they set themselves up as their own authority thinking it is just as good. It isn't becasue their authority is from man and the Church's is from God.

The world could care less of Protestantism which has always been ready to water down Catholic Christian obligations to suit it. But instinctively the world hates and fears the Catholic Chruch which for over 2,000 years will make no compromise but insists upon the fullness of Christ's doctrines (like the Holy Eucharist). The Church insists upon the strict obedience of faith, disciplinary submission of the human will to conform to the will of God, the impossibility of divorce, the sinfulness of using artificial birth control, the practice of abortion and homosexuality and so forth.

The Chruch's repitition of Christ's axiom, Deny thyself, and take up thy Cross and follow Me, interferes too much with the comfort of men. If Catholic Christianity demanded merely the admission of a few of Christ's doctrines, men would not object to it. But Christ's Church demands all of that which Christ taught and commanded in faith and morals in its fullness while the man-made churches with no central authoritative head offer no unity in doctrine or government. And while the CC keeps ticking along, they will either wake up and unite in union with the Pope and the CC or die and a new lot will arise.  

 

on May 20, 2010

Thought this was timely to this conversation.  Got this today as a devo from Dr. David Jeremiah:

Many have asked, "Why is there war?" It is simple: Earth has war because there is war in heaven. Ever since God's brightest angel, Lucifer, rebelled against his Creator-God and sought to unseat Him from His throne in heaven (Isaiah 14:12-14), conflict has been ongoing. Just as Satan opposed righteousness and justice in heaven, so he has opposed it on earth. He stirs up greed, envy, and ambition in human hearts, causing others to defend themselves against invasions and attacks. Even sincere Christians differ over how to respond to sinful aggression. The irony is that God Himself will use history's greatest battle to put an end to satanic and human rebellion on earth (Revelation 19:11-21).

As children of God, we have peace in our hearts, and when the "Prince of Peace" returns to rule and reign He will put an end to all war. Until that time comes, we need to keep in the Word, fully armed with the Sword of the Spirit, ready for spiritual battle and Christ's ultimate return.

If you are to have peace with God, there must be war with Satan.
Charles H. Spurgeon

27 PagesFirst 24 25 26 27